Demographics details for Canton, MS vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canton, MS vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Canton | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,744 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $33,411 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Canton vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 10,744 in Canton.
- The median age in Cedar park is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 35.6 years in Canton.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $33,411 in Canton.
- In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 20.0% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- The unemployment rate in Canton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Canton vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Canton | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 76 | 3 |
| White | 16 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Canton vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canton at 76% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar park at 55% compared to 16% in Canton.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Canton.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 7% in Canton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar park at 10%, compared to 1% in Canton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Canton and Cedar park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Canton | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 45.8% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canton vs Cedar park
- More residents in Canton report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 18.8% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Canton at 21.7% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 12.6% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Canton at 45.8% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Canton at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Canton | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (103) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (1,891) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (1,853) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,587) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canton vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Canton have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 14.8% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.