Demographics details for Canton, MS vs Burnt ranch, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canton, MS vs Burnt ranch, CA.
| Data | Canton | Burnt ranch |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,744 | 228 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 45.7 years |
| Median Income | $33,411 | $55,357 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 7.5 |
Population Comparison: Canton vs Burnt ranch
- In Canton, the population is higher at 10,744, compared to 228 in Burnt ranch.
- The median age in Burnt ranch is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 35.6 years in Canton.
- Burnt ranch has a higher median income of $55,357, compared to $33,411 in Canton.
- In Burnt ranch, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 20.0% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 13% in Burnt ranch.
- Burnt ranch has a higher unemployment rate at 7.5% compared to 5.2% in Canton.
Demographics
Demographics Canton vs Burnt ranch provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Canton | Burnt ranch |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 76 | Data is updating |
| White | 16 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Canton vs Burnt ranch
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canton at 76% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burnt ranch at 97% compared to 16% in Canton.
- Both Canton and Burnt ranch have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Canton at 7% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Canton at 1% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- In Burnt ranch, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Canton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Canton | Burnt ranch |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 45.8% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canton vs Burnt ranch
- More residents in Canton report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Burnt ranch.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burnt ranch at 20.0% versus 18.8% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Canton at 21.7% compared to 14.8% in Burnt ranch.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burnt ranch at 19.5% compared to 12.6% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Canton at 45.8% compared to 29.9% in Burnt ranch.
- Disability percentages are higher in Canton at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Burnt ranch.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Canton | Burnt ranch |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (103) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (1,891) | 11.8% (27) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (1,853) | 9.6% (22) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,587) | 18.9% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canton vs Burnt ranch
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Burnt ranch.
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 11.8% in Burnt ranch.
- More residents in Canton have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 9.6% in Burnt ranch.
- In Burnt ranch, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 14.8% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.