Demographics details for Canton, GA vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canton, GA vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Canton | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,809 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $75,414 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Canton vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 35,809 in Canton.
- Residents in Canton have a higher median age of 34.6 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Canton has a higher median income of $75,414 compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Canton at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Provo at 11%, compared to 9% in Canton.
- Provo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Canton.
Demographics
Demographics Canton vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Canton | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Canton vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canton at 12% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Provo at 69% compared to 55% in Canton.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Canton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Canton at 21% compared to 18% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 8% in Canton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Canton at 3% compared to 1% in Provo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Canton | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 33.4% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canton vs Provo
- In Provo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.8% in Canton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 21.8% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Canton at 16.0% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Canton at 15.8% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Provo has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 33.4% in Canton.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Canton and Provo at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Canton | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.5% (1,250) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (3,609) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 18.0% (6,437) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (7,056) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canton vs Provo
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.6% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton hold a high school diploma at 10.1% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Canton have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.