Demographics details for Canton, GA vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canton, GA vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Canton | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,809 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $75,414 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Canton vs Cranston
- The population in Cranston is higher at 82,421, compared to 35,809 in Canton.
- The median age in Cranston is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 34.6 years in Canton.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123, compared to $75,414 in Canton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Canton at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- Canton has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Canton.
Demographics
Demographics Canton vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Canton | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 5 |
| White | 55 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Canton vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canton at 12% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cranston at 61% compared to 55% in Canton.
- In Cranston, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Canton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Canton at 21% compared to 18% in Cranston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cranston at 9%, compared to 8% in Canton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Canton at 3% compared to 0% in Cranston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Canton | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 33.4% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canton vs Cranston
- More residents in Canton report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cranston at 24.9% versus 21.8% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Canton at 16.0% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 15.8% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Canton at 33.4% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cranston at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Canton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Canton | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.5% (1,250) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (3,609) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 18.0% (6,437) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (7,056) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canton vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of residents in Canton have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 1.1% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 10.1% in Canton.
- More residents in Canton have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 19.7% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.