Demographics details for Canoga park, CA vs Southlake, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Canoga park, CA vs Southlake, TX.

Data Canoga park Southlake
Population 58,116 31,102
Median Age 39.0 years 42.3 years
Median Income $78,500 $250,001
Married Families 18900.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Canoga park vs Southlake

  • In Canoga park, the population is higher at 58,116, compared to 31,102 in Southlake.
  • The median age in Southlake is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 39.0 years in Canoga park.
  • Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $78,500 in Canoga park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Canoga park at 18900.0% compared to 54.0% in Southlake.
  • Canoga park has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Southlake.
  • The unemployment rate in Canoga park is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Southlake.

Demographics

Demographics Canoga park vs Southlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Canoga park Southlake
Black 3 1
White 52 68
Asian 10 17
Hispanic 30 9
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Canoga park vs Southlake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canoga park at 3% compared to 1% in Southlake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Southlake at 68% compared to 52% in Canoga park.
  • In Southlake, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 10% in Canoga park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Canoga park at 30% compared to 9% in Southlake.
  • Both Canoga park and Southlake have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Canoga park and Southlake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Canoga park Southlake
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 7.2%
Depression Data is updating% 21.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 8.4%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 19.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 27.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Canoga park vs Southlake

  • In Southlake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Southlake at 21.3% versus 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Southlake has a higher smoking rate at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Southlake has higher obesity rates at 27.1% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Southlake at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Canoga park Southlake
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (15)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.2% (1,302)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.3% (392)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 46.0% (14,310)

Education Levels Comparison: Canoga park vs Southlake

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Canoga park and Southlake at 0.0%.
  • In Southlake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Southlake at 1.3%, compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • In Southlake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.