Demographics details for Canoga park, CA vs Aulander, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Canoga park, CA vs Aulander, NC.

Data Canoga park Aulander
Population 58,116 727
Median Age 39.0 years 42.4 years
Median Income $78,500 $33,250
Married Families 18900.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 12% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 6.1

Population Comparison: Canoga park vs Aulander

  • In Canoga park, the population is higher at 58,116, compared to 727 in Aulander.
  • The median age in Aulander is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 39.0 years in Canoga park.
  • Canoga park has a higher median income of $78,500 compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Canoga park at 18900.0% compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
  • The poverty level is higher in Aulander at 14%, compared to 12% in Canoga park.
  • Aulander has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.5% in Canoga park.

Demographics

Demographics Canoga park vs Aulander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Canoga park Aulander
Black 3 61
White 52 38
Asian 10 Data is updating
Hispanic 30 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Canoga park vs Aulander

  • In Aulander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 3% in Canoga park.
  • Canoga park has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 38% in Aulander.
  • The Asian population is larger in Canoga park at 10% compared to 0% in Aulander.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Canoga park at 30% compared to 0% in Aulander.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Canoga park at 5% compared to 1% in Aulander.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Canoga park and Aulander at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Canoga park Aulander
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.7%
Depression Data is updating% 23.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.9%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 44.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Canoga park vs Aulander

  • In Aulander, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Aulander at 23.5% versus 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Aulander has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Aulander at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Aulander has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Canoga park Aulander
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (3)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.3% (97)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 28.5% (207)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.9% (21)

Education Levels Comparison: Canoga park vs Aulander

  • In Aulander, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • In Aulander, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aulander at 28.5%, compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • In Aulander, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.