Demographics details for Caneyville, KY vs Keizer, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Caneyville, KY vs Keizer, OR.
| Data | Caneyville | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 529 | 38,704 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $42,212 | $75,753 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Caneyville vs Keizer
- The population in Keizer is higher at 38,704, compared to 529 in Caneyville.
- The median age in Keizer is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 33.2 years in Caneyville.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753, compared to $42,212 in Caneyville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Caneyville at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Keizer.
- Caneyville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Keizer.
- The unemployment rate in Caneyville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Keizer.
Demographics
Demographics Caneyville vs Keizer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Caneyville | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 88 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Caneyville vs Keizer
- In Keizer, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Caneyville.
- Caneyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 58% in Keizer.
- In Keizer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Caneyville.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 1% in Caneyville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keizer at 14%, compared to 11% in Caneyville.
- In Keizer, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Caneyville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Caneyville | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.8% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 32.2% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 29.7% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Caneyville vs Keizer
- More residents in Caneyville report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 17.9% in Keizer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Caneyville at 32.2% compared to 28.5% in Keizer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Caneyville at 29.7% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Keizer at 16.5% compared to 13.7% in Caneyville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Caneyville at 41.7% compared to 35.7% in Keizer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Caneyville at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Keizer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Caneyville | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (685) |
| High School Diploma | 22.1% (117) | 12.7% (4,898) |
| Less than High School | 20.8% (110) | 13.9% (5,363) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (86) | 17.1% (6,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Caneyville vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Caneyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Caneyville hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 12.7% in Keizer.
- More residents in Caneyville have less than a high school education at 20.8% compared to 13.9% in Keizer.
- In Keizer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Caneyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.