Demographics details for Canadian, OK vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Canadian, OK vs Whitehall, WI.
| Data | Canadian | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 169,149 | 1,632 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $82,364 | $56,894 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Canadian vs Whitehall
- In Canadian, the population is higher at 169,149, compared to 1,632 in Whitehall.
- The median age in Whitehall is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 36.2 years in Canadian.
- Canadian has a higher median income of $82,364 compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Canadian at 41.0% compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- The poverty level is higher in Whitehall at 7%, compared to 0% in Canadian.
- Whitehall has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.3% in Canadian.
Demographics
Demographics Canadian vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Canadian | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 72 | 83 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Canadian vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Canadian at 3% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whitehall at 83% compared to 72% in Canadian.
- The Asian population is larger in Canadian at 3% compared to 0% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 10% in Canadian.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Canadian at 9% compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Canadian at 3% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Canadian | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Canadian vs Whitehall
- More residents in Canadian report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 24.0% versus 22.0% in Canadian.
- Whitehall has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 15.3% in Canadian.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 14.7% in Canadian.
- Obesity rates are higher in Canadian at 36.2% compared to 34.9% in Whitehall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Canadian.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Canadian | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,195) | 0.4% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (24,325) | 24.4% (398) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (14,929) | 15.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (33,289) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Canadian vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of residents in Canadian have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 14.4% in Canadian.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whitehall at 15.7%, compared to 8.8% in Canadian.
- A higher percentage of residents in Canadian hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.