Demographics details for Cameron, TX vs Rogue river, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cameron, TX vs Rogue river, OR.
| Data | Cameron | Rogue river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 425,208 | 2,380 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 52.6 years |
| Median Income | $47,435 | $43,929 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cameron vs Rogue river
- In Cameron, the population is higher at 425,208, compared to 2,380 in Rogue river.
- The median age in Rogue river is higher at 52.6 years, compared to 32.0 years in Cameron.
- Cameron has a higher median income of $47,435 compared to $43,929 in Rogue river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cameron at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Rogue river.
- Cameron has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Rogue river.
- The unemployment rate in Cameron is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.5% in Rogue river.
Demographics
Demographics Cameron vs Rogue river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cameron | Rogue river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 60 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 89 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 29 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cameron vs Rogue river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cameron at 1% compared to 0% in Rogue river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rogue river at 85% compared to 60% in Cameron.
- Both Cameron and Rogue river have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cameron at 89% compared to 5% in Rogue river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cameron at 29% compared to 8% in Rogue river.
- In Rogue river, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cameron.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cameron | Rogue river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 29.2% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 44.6% | 29.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cameron vs Rogue river
- In Rogue river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Cameron.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rogue river at 29.2% versus 19.0% in Cameron.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cameron at 15.4% compared to 15.3% in Rogue river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rogue river at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Cameron.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cameron at 44.6% compared to 29.6% in Rogue river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rogue river at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Cameron.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cameron | Rogue river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (11,750) | 0.7% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (53,487) | 16.5% (392) |
| Less than High School | 34.2% (145,250) | 12.7% (302) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (48,712) | 10.1% (240) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cameron vs Rogue river
- A higher percentage of residents in Cameron have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.7% in Rogue river.
- In Rogue river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 12.6% in Cameron.
- More residents in Cameron have less than a high school education at 34.2% compared to 12.7% in Rogue river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cameron hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 10.1% in Rogue river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.