Demographics details for Cameron, TX vs Chesapeake, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cameron, TX vs Chesapeake, VA.
Data | Cameron | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Population | 425,208 | 252,488 |
Median Age | 32.0 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $47,435 | $92,703 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Cameron vs Chesapeake
- In Cameron, the population is higher at 425,208, compared to 252,488 in Chesapeake.
- The median age in Chesapeake is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 32.0 years in Cameron.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703, compared to $47,435 in Cameron.
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 36.0% in Cameron.
- Cameron has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- The unemployment rate in Cameron is higher at 6.2%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Cameron vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cameron | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 29 |
White | 60 | 53 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 89 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 29 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cameron vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 1% in Cameron.
- Cameron has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Cameron.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cameron at 89% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cameron at 29% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cameron and Chesapeake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cameron | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.0% |
Depression | 19.0% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 44.6% | 36.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cameron vs Chesapeake
- More residents in Cameron report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chesapeake at 20.9% versus 19.0% in Cameron.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cameron at 15.4% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cameron at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cameron at 44.6% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cameron at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cameron | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.8% (11,750) | 0.8% (2,039) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (53,487) | 13.1% (33,024) |
Less than High School | 34.2% (145,250) | 7.0% (17,684) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (48,712) | 23.8% (60,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cameron vs Chesapeake
- A higher percentage of residents in Cameron have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 12.6% in Cameron.
- More residents in Cameron have less than a high school education at 34.2% compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 11.5% in Cameron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.