Demographics details for Camden, TN vs Kaysville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camden, TN vs Kaysville, UT.
| Data | Camden | Kaysville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,659 | 32,761 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $42,500 | $121,867 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Camden vs Kaysville
- The population in Kaysville is higher at 32,761, compared to 3,659 in Camden.
- Residents in Camden have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 32.1 years in Kaysville.
- Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867, compared to $42,500 in Camden.
- In Kaysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 33.0% in Camden.
- Camden has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- The unemployment rate in Camden is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in Kaysville.
Demographics
Demographics Camden vs Kaysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camden | Kaysville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Camden vs Kaysville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Camden at 4% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- Camden has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 88% in Kaysville.
- In Kaysville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Camden.
- Kaysville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Camden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kaysville at 6%, compared to 2% in Camden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Camden and Kaysville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camden | Kaysville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 31.6% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 6.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 11.4% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camden vs Kaysville
- More residents in Camden report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 14.8% in Kaysville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Camden at 31.6% compared to 23.7% in Kaysville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Camden at 25.6% compared to 6.7% in Kaysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Camden at 14.6% compared to 11.4% in Kaysville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Camden at 35.8% compared to 31.6% in Kaysville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Camden at 26.0% compared to 8.0% in Kaysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camden | Kaysville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (37) | 0.4% (141) |
| High School Diploma | 23.7% (868) | 6.1% (1,986) |
| Less than High School | 19.6% (716) | 2.6% (859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (389) | 28.5% (9,340) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camden vs Kaysville
- A higher percentage of residents in Camden have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Kaysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camden hold a high school diploma at 23.7% compared to 6.1% in Kaysville.
- More residents in Camden have less than a high school education at 19.6% compared to 2.6% in Kaysville.
- In Kaysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 10.6% in Camden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.