Demographics details for Camden, TN vs Arapaho, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camden, TN vs Arapaho, OK.
| Data | Camden | Arapaho |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,659 | 654 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $42,500 | $37,361 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Camden vs Arapaho
- In Camden, the population is higher at 3,659, compared to 654 in Arapaho.
- Residents in Camden have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 38.1 years in Arapaho.
- Camden has a higher median income of $42,500 compared to $37,361 in Arapaho.
- In Arapaho, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 33.0% in Camden.
- The poverty level is identical in both Camden and Arapaho at 14%.
- The unemployment rate in Camden is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Arapaho.
Demographics
Demographics Camden vs Arapaho provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camden | Arapaho |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 94 | 64 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Camden vs Arapaho
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Camden at 4% compared to 2% in Arapaho.
- Camden has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 64% in Arapaho.
- Both Camden and Arapaho have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Arapaho has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 0% in Camden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arapaho at 6%, compared to 2% in Camden.
- In Arapaho, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Camden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camden | Arapaho |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 31.6% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camden vs Arapaho
- More residents in Camden report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.3% in Arapaho.
- Depression is more prevalent in Camden at 31.6% compared to 24.5% in Arapaho.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Camden at 25.6% compared to 20.6% in Arapaho.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arapaho at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in Camden.
- Arapaho has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 35.8% in Camden.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Camden and Arapaho at 26.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camden | Arapaho |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (37) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.7% (868) | 41.6% (272) |
| Less than High School | 19.6% (716) | 16.2% (106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (389) | 4.1% (27) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camden vs Arapaho
- A higher percentage of residents in Camden have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Arapaho.
- In Arapaho, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.6% compared to 23.7% in Camden.
- More residents in Camden have less than a high school education at 19.6% compared to 16.2% in Arapaho.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.6% compared to 4.1% in Arapaho.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.