Demographics details for Camden, OH vs Glen elder, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camden, OH vs Glen elder, KS.
| Data | Camden | Glen elder |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,973 | 363 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 42.7 years |
| Median Income | $49,667 | $65,417 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 80.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Camden vs Glen elder
- In Camden, the population is higher at 1,973, compared to 363 in Glen elder.
- Residents in Camden have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 42.7 years in Glen elder.
- Glen elder has a higher median income of $65,417, compared to $49,667 in Camden.
- In Glen elder, the percentage of married families is higher at 80.0%, compared to 44.0% in Camden.
- Camden has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Glen elder.
- The unemployment rate in Camden is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.
Demographics
Demographics Camden vs Glen elder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camden | Glen elder |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 98 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Camden vs Glen elder
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Camden at 1% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
- Camden has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 86% in Glen elder.
- In Glen elder, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Camden.
- Glen elder has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Camden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Glen elder at 5%, compared to 1% in Camden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Camden and Glen elder at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camden | Glen elder |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 40.9% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camden vs Glen elder
- More residents in Camden report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.8% in Glen elder.
- Depression is more prevalent in Camden at 24.3% compared to 21.3% in Glen elder.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Camden at 23.1% compared to 17.7% in Glen elder.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 18.1% in Camden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Camden at 40.9% compared to 38.5% in Glen elder.
- Disability percentages are higher in Camden at 26.0% compared to 22.0% in Glen elder.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camden | Glen elder |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 0.6% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 31.6% (623) | 30.3% (110) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (179) | 1.7% (6) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (96) | 16.5% (60) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camden vs Glen elder
- In Glen elder, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Camden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camden hold a high school diploma at 31.6% compared to 30.3% in Glen elder.
- More residents in Camden have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
- In Glen elder, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 4.9% in Camden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.