Demographics details for Camden, AR vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camden, AR vs Lexington, NC.
| Data | Camden | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,298 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $48,302 | $36,868 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Camden vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 10,298 in Camden.
- Residents in Camden have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
- Camden has a higher median income of $48,302 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Camden.
- Camden has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Camden.
Demographics
Demographics Camden vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camden | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 31 |
| White | 44 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Camden vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Camden at 52% compared to 31% in Lexington.
- Camden has a higher percentage of White residents at 44% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Camden.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 2% in Camden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 2% in Camden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Camden and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camden | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 27.3% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.9% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 43.6% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camden vs Lexington
- More residents in Camden report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 19.2% in Lexington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 24.4% in Camden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Camden at 27.3% compared to 24.1% in Lexington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 13.8% compared to 11.9% in Camden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Camden at 43.6% compared to 42.7% in Lexington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Camden at 27.0% compared to 18.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camden | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (28) | 2.7% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (2,109) | 17.0% (3,355) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (1,455) | 25.6% (5,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (1,152) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camden vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.3% in Camden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camden hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 14.1% in Camden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.