Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs Woodstock, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs Woodstock, GA.
| Data | Cambridge | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,985 | 37,350 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $39,589 | $100,913 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Woodstock
- The population in Woodstock is higher at 37,350, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913, compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 11 |
| White | 88 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 6% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Cambridge.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 26.2% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 46.4% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Woodstock
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 25.9% compared to 20.8% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (73) | 0.3% (107) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (2,502) | 8.2% (3,052) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (1,732) | 3.7% (1,375) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (875) | 32.9% (12,290) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.