Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs Kosciusko, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs Kosciusko, MS.
| Data | Cambridge | Kosciusko |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,985 | 6,922 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $39,589 | $33,719 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Kosciusko
- In Cambridge, the population is higher at 9,985, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
- The median age in Kosciusko is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $39,589 compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cambridge at 28.0% compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
- The poverty level is higher in Kosciusko at 22%, compared to 16% in Cambridge.
- Kosciusko has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.5% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Kosciusko provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Kosciusko |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 53 |
| White | 88 | 42 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Kosciusko
- In Kosciusko, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 6% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
- Both Cambridge and Kosciusko have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cambridge and Kosciusko at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cambridge at 4% compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Kosciusko at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Kosciusko |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.2% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 26.2% | 26.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 11.3% |
| Obesity | 46.4% | 46.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Kosciusko
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 19.8% in Kosciusko.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 25.9% compared to 22.8% in Kosciusko.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 26.1% in Kosciusko.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 46.0% in Kosciusko.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Kosciusko.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Kosciusko |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (73) | 0.6% (39) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (2,502) | 18.4% (1,276) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (1,732) | 9.0% (624) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (875) | 12.8% (886) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Kosciusko
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Kosciusko.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 18.4% in Kosciusko.
- More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
- In Kosciusko, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.