Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs Healdton, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs Healdton, OK.
Data | Cambridge | Healdton |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,985 | 2,334 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 42.9 years |
Median Income | $39,589 | $45,721 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Healdton
- In Cambridge, the population is higher at 9,985, compared to 2,334 in Healdton.
- The median age in Healdton is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Healdton has a higher median income of $45,721, compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- In Healdton, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Healdton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cambridge and Healdton at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Healdton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cambridge | Healdton |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1 |
White | 88 | 75 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Healdton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 6% compared to 1% in Healdton.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 75% in Healdton.
- Both Cambridge and Healdton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Healdton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Healdton at 11%, compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- In Healdton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cambridge | Healdton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.9% |
Depression | 25.9% | 28.2% |
Smoking | 26.2% | 24.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 46.4% | 42.2% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Healdton
- In Healdton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 20.4% in Cambridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Healdton at 28.2% versus 25.9% in Cambridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 24.9% in Healdton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 14.6% in Healdton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 42.2% in Healdton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Healdton at 26.0% compared to 19.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cambridge | Healdton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (73) | 3.4% (80) |
High School Diploma | 25.1% (2,502) | 24.2% (565) |
Less than High School | 17.3% (1,732) | 25.1% (587) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (875) | 11.8% (276) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Healdton
- In Healdton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 24.2% in Healdton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Healdton at 25.1%, compared to 17.3% in Cambridge.
- In Healdton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.