Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs Friona, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs Friona, TX.
Data | Cambridge | Friona |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,985 | 4,053 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 37.7 years |
Median Income | $39,589 | $67,837 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Friona
- In Cambridge, the population is higher at 9,985, compared to 4,053 in Friona.
- The median age in Friona is higher at 37.7 years, compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Friona has a higher median income of $67,837, compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- In Friona, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Friona.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Friona.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Friona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cambridge | Friona |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1 |
White | 88 | 4 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 74 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 19 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Friona
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 6% compared to 1% in Friona.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 4% in Friona.
- Both Cambridge and Friona have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Friona has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 74%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friona at 19%, compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- In Friona, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cambridge | Friona |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.9% |
Depression | 25.9% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 26.2% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 46.4% | 40.2% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Friona
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.1% in Friona.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 25.9% compared to 21.4% in Friona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 17.3% in Friona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 16.5% in Friona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 40.2% in Friona.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Friona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cambridge | Friona |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (73) | 5.7% (232) |
High School Diploma | 25.1% (2,502) | 13.4% (543) |
Less than High School | 17.3% (1,732) | 43.8% (1,777) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (875) | 8.4% (342) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Friona
- In Friona, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.7% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 13.4% in Friona.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friona at 43.8%, compared to 17.3% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 8.4% in Friona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.