Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs Forest lake, MN.
| Data | Cambridge | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,985 | 20,857 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $39,589 | $91,157 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Forest lake
- The population in Forest lake is higher at 20,857, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- The median age in Forest lake is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 3 |
| White | 88 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 6% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 81% in Forest lake.
- In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Cambridge.
- Forest lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Forest lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 26.2% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 46.4% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Forest lake
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 25.9% compared to 24.1% in Forest lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (73) | 0.5% (101) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (2,502) | 14.6% (3,055) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (1,732) | 7.7% (1,615) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (875) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
- More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- In Forest lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.