Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs Dearborn, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs Dearborn, MI.
| Data | Cambridge | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,985 | 107,710 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 32.3 years |
| Median Income | $39,589 | $64,600 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Dearborn
- The population in Dearborn is higher at 107,710, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Cambridge have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600, compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- In Dearborn, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Dearborn.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Dearborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 3 |
| White | 88 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Dearborn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 6% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 86% in Dearborn.
- In Dearborn, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Cambridge.
- Dearborn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dearborn at 5%, compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Dearborn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 26.2% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 46.4% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Dearborn
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 19.4% in Dearborn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dearborn at 26.6% versus 25.9% in Cambridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 24.6% in Dearborn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (73) | 2.8% (3,058) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (2,502) | 12.3% (13,249) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (1,732) | 17.5% (18,849) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (875) | 21.3% (22,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dearborn at 17.5%, compared to 17.3% in Cambridge.
- In Dearborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.