Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs Colorado springs, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs Colorado springs, CO.

Data Cambridge Colorado springs
Population 9,985 486,248
Median Age 35.1 years 35.1 years
Median Income $39,589 $79,026
Married Families 28.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 16% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Colorado springs

  • The population in Colorado springs is higher at 486,248, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
  • The median age is the same in both Cambridge and Colorado springs at 35.1 years.
  • Colorado springs has a higher median income of $79,026, compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
  • In Colorado springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
  • Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 11% in Colorado springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Colorado springs.

Demographics

Demographics Cambridge vs Colorado springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cambridge Colorado springs
Black 6 6
White 88 61
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 2 18
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Colorado springs

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cambridge and Colorado springs at 6%.
  • Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 61% in Colorado springs.
  • In Colorado springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Cambridge.
  • Colorado springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Colorado springs at 11%, compared to 4% in Cambridge.
  • In Colorado springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cambridge Colorado springs
Mental Health Not Good 20.4% 16.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.1% 10.8%
Depression 25.9% 25.4%
Smoking 26.2% 14.5%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 15.8%
Obesity 46.4% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Colorado springs

  • More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.2% in Colorado springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 25.9% compared to 25.4% in Colorado springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 14.5% in Colorado springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 15.8% in Colorado springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 28.4% in Colorado springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Colorado springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cambridge Colorado springs
No Schooling 0.7% (73) 0.7% (3,192)
High School Diploma 25.1% (2,502) 10.2% (49,754)
Less than High School 17.3% (1,732) 6.8% (33,298)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.8% (875) 27.3% (132,822)

Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Colorado springs

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cambridge and Colorado springs at 0.7%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 10.2% in Colorado springs.
  • More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 6.8% in Colorado springs.
  • In Colorado springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.