Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs Bell gardens, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs Bell gardens, CA.
Data | Cambridge | Bell gardens |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,985 | 37,927 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 31.1 years |
Median Income | $39,589 | $53,935 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.7 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Bell gardens
- The population in Bell gardens is higher at 37,927, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Cambridge have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher median income of $53,935, compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cambridge at 28.0% compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher unemployment rate at 6.7% compared to 4.5% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Bell gardens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cambridge | Bell gardens |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1 |
White | 88 | -35 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 99 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 34 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Bell gardens
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 6% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
- Both Cambridge and Bell gardens have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Bell gardens has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 99%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bell gardens at 34%, compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- In Bell gardens, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cambridge | Bell gardens |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 17.9% |
Depression | 25.9% | 17.5% |
Smoking | 26.2% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 13.3% |
Obesity | 46.4% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Bell gardens
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 18.9% in Bell gardens.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 25.9% compared to 17.5% in Bell gardens.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 16.2% in Bell gardens.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 37.2% in Bell gardens.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cambridge | Bell gardens |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (73) | 4.5% (1,722) |
High School Diploma | 25.1% (2,502) | 16.9% (6,418) |
Less than High School | 17.3% (1,732) | 60.8% (23,053) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (875) | 3.9% (1,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Bell gardens
- In Bell gardens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 16.9% in Bell gardens.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bell gardens at 60.8%, compared to 17.3% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.