Demographics details for Cambridge, MD vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MD vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Cambridge | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,129 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $44,114 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Cranston
- The population in Cranston is higher at 82,421, compared to 13,129 in Cambridge.
- The median age in Cranston is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.3 years in Cambridge.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123, compared to $44,114 in Cambridge.
- In Cranston, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 27.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Cranston.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Cranston.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 44 | 5 |
| White | 35 | 61 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 44% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cranston at 61% compared to 35% in Cambridge.
- In Cranston, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Cambridge.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cambridge at 11% compared to 9% in Cranston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Cranston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 20.9% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Cranston
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cranston at 24.9% versus 20.3% in Cambridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 20.9% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 12.6% in Cambridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 42.2% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (120) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 22.1% (2,903) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 11.2% (1,477) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (1,783) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Cranston
- In Cranston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cranston at 13.4%, compared to 11.2% in Cambridge.
- In Cranston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 13.6% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.