Demographics details for Cambridge, MD vs Costa mesa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MD vs Costa mesa, CA.
Data | Cambridge | Costa mesa |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,129 | 109,521 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $44,114 | $104,981 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Costa mesa
- The population in Costa mesa is higher at 109,521, compared to 13,129 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Cambridge have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Costa mesa.
- Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981, compared to $44,114 in Cambridge.
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 27.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Costa mesa.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.6% in Costa mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Costa mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cambridge | Costa mesa |
---|---|---|
Black | 44 | 1 |
White | 35 | 40 |
Asian | 2 | 9 |
Hispanic | 8 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Costa mesa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 44% compared to 1% in Costa mesa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Costa mesa at 40% compared to 35% in Cambridge.
- In Costa mesa, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Cambridge.
- Costa mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Costa mesa at 12%, compared to 11% in Cambridge.
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cambridge | Costa mesa |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.4% |
Depression | 20.3% | 18.5% |
Smoking | 20.9% | 10.9% |
Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 42.2% | 27.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Costa mesa
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 20.3% compared to 18.5% in Costa mesa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 20.9% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Costa mesa at 17.1% compared to 12.6% in Cambridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 42.2% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cambridge | Costa mesa |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (120) | 1.8% (2,006) |
High School Diploma | 22.1% (2,903) | 11.3% (12,406) |
Less than High School | 11.2% (1,477) | 17.3% (18,969) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (1,783) | 31.2% (34,140) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Costa mesa
- In Costa mesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.9% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Costa mesa at 17.3%, compared to 11.2% in Cambridge.
- In Costa mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 13.6% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.