Demographics details for Cambridge, MA vs Woodridge, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MA vs Woodridge, IL.
| Data | Cambridge | Woodridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,488 | 33,587 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $121,539 | $95,756 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Woodridge
- In Cambridge, the population is higher at 118,488, compared to 33,587 in Woodridge.
- The median age in Woodridge is higher at 37.7 years, compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539 compared to $95,756 in Woodridge.
- In Woodridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Woodridge.
- Woodridge has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Woodridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Woodridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 11 |
| White | 53 | 53 |
| Asian | 19 | 13 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Woodridge
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cambridge and Woodridge at 11%.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Cambridge and Woodridge at 53%.
- The Asian population is larger in Cambridge at 19% compared to 13% in Woodridge.
- Woodridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 9% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cambridge at 8% compared to 7% in Woodridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Woodridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Woodridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 8.1% | 10.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Woodridge
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 19.2% compared to 16.9% in Woodridge.
- Woodridge has a higher smoking rate at 10.9% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 17.7% compared to 16.3% in Woodridge.
- Woodridge has higher obesity rates at 30.6% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodridge at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Woodridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,031) | 1.0% (340) |
| High School Diploma | 3.7% (4,373) | 10.4% (3,489) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (5,440) | 8.1% (2,732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.0% (63,931) | 32.7% (10,993) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Woodridge
- In Woodridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Cambridge.
- In Woodridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.4% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodridge at 8.1%, compared to 4.6% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 32.7% in Woodridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.