Demographics details for Cambridge, MA vs Tulsa, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MA vs Tulsa, OK.
| Data | Cambridge | Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,488 | 411,867 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $121,539 | $56,648 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Tulsa
- The population in Tulsa is higher at 411,867, compared to 118,488 in Cambridge.
- The median age in Tulsa is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539 compared to $56,648 in Tulsa.
- In Tulsa, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Tulsa at 16%, compared to 14% in Cambridge.
- Tulsa has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Tulsa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 15 |
| White | 53 | 48 |
| Asian | 19 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Tulsa
- In Tulsa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 11% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 48% in Tulsa.
- The Asian population is larger in Cambridge at 19% compared to 3% in Tulsa.
- Tulsa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 9% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tulsa at 13%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- In Tulsa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 8.1% | 18.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Tulsa
- In Tulsa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tulsa at 25.2% versus 19.2% in Cambridge.
- Tulsa has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 17.7% compared to 13.3% in Tulsa.
- Tulsa has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tulsa at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,031) | 1.2% (5,029) |
| High School Diploma | 3.7% (4,373) | 14.0% (57,640) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (5,440) | 13.8% (56,774) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.0% (63,931) | 21.7% (89,557) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Tulsa
- In Tulsa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Cambridge.
- In Tulsa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tulsa at 13.8%, compared to 4.6% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 21.7% in Tulsa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.