Demographics details for Cambridge, MA vs Siloam springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MA vs Siloam springs, AR.

Data Cambridge Siloam springs
Population 118,488 18,654
Median Age 30.6 years 30.1 years
Median Income $121,539 $59,911
Married Families 29.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 14% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Siloam springs

  • In Cambridge, the population is higher at 118,488, compared to 18,654 in Siloam springs.
  • Residents in Cambridge have a higher median age of 30.6 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539 compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
  • Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 13% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.

Demographics

Demographics Cambridge vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cambridge Siloam springs
Black 11 1
White 53 50
Asian 19 3
Hispanic 9 23
Two or More Races 8 20
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Siloam springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 11% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
  • Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cambridge at 19% compared to 3% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 9% in Cambridge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cambridge Siloam springs
Mental Health Not Good 12.8% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.6% 15.0%
Depression 19.2% 26.0%
Smoking 8.1% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 14.9%
Obesity 23.8% 39.2%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Siloam springs at 26.0% versus 19.2% in Cambridge.
  • Siloam springs has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 17.7% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Siloam springs at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cambridge Siloam springs
No Schooling 0.9% (1,031) 3.7% (681)
High School Diploma 3.7% (4,373) 13.5% (2,510)
Less than High School 4.6% (5,440) 17.4% (3,249)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 54.0% (63,931) 14.4% (2,680)

Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.9% in Cambridge.
  • In Siloam springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Siloam springs at 17.4%, compared to 4.6% in Cambridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.