Demographics details for Cambridge, MA vs Red lodge, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MA vs Red lodge, MT.
Data | Cambridge | Red lodge |
---|---|---|
Population | 118,488 | 2,510 |
Median Age | 30.6 years | 52.9 years |
Median Income | $121,539 | $39,472 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Red lodge
- In Cambridge, the population is higher at 118,488, compared to 2,510 in Red lodge.
- The median age in Red lodge is higher at 52.9 years, compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539 compared to $39,472 in Red lodge.
- In Red lodge, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Red lodge.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.5% in Red lodge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Red lodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cambridge | Red lodge |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 1 |
White | 53 | 91 |
Asian | 19 | 2 |
Hispanic | 9 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Red lodge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 11% compared to 1% in Red lodge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Red lodge at 91% compared to 53% in Cambridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Cambridge at 19% compared to 2% in Red lodge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cambridge at 9% compared to 4% in Red lodge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cambridge at 8% compared to 2% in Red lodge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Red lodge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cambridge | Red lodge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 9.4% |
Depression | 19.2% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 8.1% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 23.2% |
Obesity | 23.8% | 30.5% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Red lodge
- In Red lodge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Red lodge at 22.8% versus 19.2% in Cambridge.
- Red lodge has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Red lodge at 23.2% compared to 17.7% in Cambridge.
- Red lodge has higher obesity rates at 30.5% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Red lodge at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cambridge | Red lodge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (1,031) | 0.2% (4) |
High School Diploma | 3.7% (4,373) | 16.9% (423) |
Less than High School | 4.6% (5,440) | 2.0% (50) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.0% (63,931) | 31.4% (787) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Red lodge
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Red lodge.
- In Red lodge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
- More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 4.6% compared to 2.0% in Red lodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 31.4% in Red lodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.