Demographics details for Cambridge, MA vs Park ridge, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MA vs Park ridge, NJ.
| Data | Cambridge | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,488 | 9,426 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 47.8 years |
| Median Income | $121,539 | $164,241 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Park ridge
- In Cambridge, the population is higher at 118,488, compared to 9,426 in Park ridge.
- The median age in Park ridge is higher at 47.8 years, compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
- Park ridge has a higher median income of $164,241, compared to $121,539 in Cambridge.
- In Park ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Park ridge.
- Park ridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Park ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 1 |
| White | 53 | 77 |
| Asian | 19 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Park ridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 11% compared to 1% in Park ridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Park ridge at 77% compared to 53% in Cambridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Cambridge at 19% compared to 4% in Park ridge.
- Park ridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 9% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cambridge at 8% compared to 5% in Park ridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Park ridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 8.1% | 10.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 24.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Park ridge
- In Park ridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.1% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cambridge at 19.2% compared to 17.8% in Park ridge.
- Park ridge has a higher smoking rate at 10.2% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Park ridge at 18.7% compared to 17.7% in Cambridge.
- Park ridge has higher obesity rates at 24.6% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Park ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,031) | 0.3% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 3.7% (4,373) | 12.4% (1,169) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (5,440) | 5.8% (549) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.0% (63,931) | 37.8% (3,565) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Park ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Park ridge.
- In Park ridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.4% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Park ridge at 5.8%, compared to 4.6% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 37.8% in Park ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.