Demographics details for Cambridge, MA vs Mccurtain, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MA vs Mccurtain, OK.
| Data | Cambridge | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,488 | 30,931 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $121,539 | $47,046 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Mccurtain
- In Cambridge, the population is higher at 118,488, compared to 30,931 in Mccurtain.
- The median age in Mccurtain is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539 compared to $47,046 in Mccurtain.
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Mccurtain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 8 |
| White | 53 | 58 |
| Asian | 19 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 14 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Mccurtain
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 11% compared to 8% in Mccurtain.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mccurtain at 58% compared to 53% in Cambridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Cambridge at 19% compared to 1% in Mccurtain.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cambridge at 9% compared to 7% in Mccurtain.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 8.1% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 46.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccurtain at 26.9% versus 19.2% in Cambridge.
- Mccurtain has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 17.7% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,031) | 0.7% (209) |
| High School Diploma | 3.7% (4,373) | 23.5% (7,268) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (5,440) | 17.2% (5,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.0% (63,931) | 10.3% (3,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Mccurtain
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Mccurtain.
- In Mccurtain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccurtain at 17.2%, compared to 4.6% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 10.3% in Mccurtain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.