Demographics details for Cambridge, MA vs El cajon, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MA vs El cajon, CA.
| Data | Cambridge | El cajon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,488 | 104,414 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $121,539 | $64,128 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs El cajon
- In Cambridge, the population is higher at 118,488, compared to 104,414 in El cajon.
- The median age in El cajon is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539 compared to $64,128 in El cajon.
- In El cajon, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cambridge and El cajon at 14%.
- El cajon has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs El cajon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | El cajon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 6 |
| White | 53 | 48 |
| Asian | 19 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs El cajon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 11% compared to 6% in El cajon.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 48% in El cajon.
- The Asian population is larger in Cambridge at 19% compared to 4% in El cajon.
- El cajon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 9% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in El cajon at 12%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- In El cajon, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | El cajon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 8.1% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 27.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs El cajon
- In El cajon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in El cajon at 20.1% versus 19.2% in Cambridge.
- El cajon has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in El cajon at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in Cambridge.
- El cajon has higher obesity rates at 27.6% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in El cajon at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | El cajon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,031) | 3.3% (3,414) |
| High School Diploma | 3.7% (4,373) | 15.8% (16,528) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (5,440) | 19.6% (20,453) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.0% (63,931) | 15.4% (16,057) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs El cajon
- In El cajon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.9% in Cambridge.
- In El cajon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in El cajon at 19.6%, compared to 4.6% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 15.4% in El cajon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.