Demographics details for Cambridge, MA vs Averill park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, MA vs Averill park, NY.

Data Cambridge Averill park
Population 118,488 1,608
Median Age 30.6 years 53.3 years
Median Income $121,539 $109,746
Married Families 29.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 14% 4%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Averill park

  • In Cambridge, the population is higher at 118,488, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
  • Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539 compared to $109,746 in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
  • Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • Averill park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.

Demographics

Demographics Cambridge vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cambridge Averill park
Black 11 Data is updating
White 53 100
Asian 19 Data is updating
Hispanic 9 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 11% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 53% in Cambridge.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cambridge at 19% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cambridge at 9% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cambridge at 8% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Averill park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cambridge Averill park
Mental Health Not Good 12.8% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 7.6% 9.1%
Depression 19.2% 23.7%
Smoking 8.1% 15.9%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 21.5%
Obesity 23.8% 34.6%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Averill park

  • In Averill park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Averill park at 23.7% versus 19.2% in Cambridge.
  • Averill park has a higher smoking rate at 15.9% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 17.7% in Cambridge.
  • Averill park has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Averill park at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cambridge Averill park
No Schooling 0.9% (1,031) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 3.7% (4,373) 22.0% (354)
Less than High School 4.6% (5,440) 3.7% (60)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 54.0% (63,931) 32.3% (520)

Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
  • More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 4.6% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 32.3% in Averill park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.