Demographics details for Camas, WA vs Sullivan city, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camas, WA vs Sullivan city, TX.
| Data | Camas | Sullivan city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,371 | 3,903 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $133,829 | $39,067 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Camas vs Sullivan city
- In Camas, the population is higher at 27,371, compared to 3,903 in Sullivan city.
- Residents in Camas have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Sullivan city.
- Camas has a higher median income of $133,829 compared to $39,067 in Sullivan city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Camas at 49.0% compared to 38.0% in Sullivan city.
- The poverty level is higher in Sullivan city at 22%, compared to 4% in Camas.
- The unemployment rate in Camas is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Sullivan city.
Demographics
Demographics Camas vs Sullivan city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camas | Sullivan city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | -35 |
| Asian | 10 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 100 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 35 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Camas vs Sullivan city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Camas at 2% compared to 0% in Sullivan city.
- Camas has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to -35% in Sullivan city.
- The Asian population is larger in Camas at 10% compared to 0% in Sullivan city.
- Sullivan city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 100%, compared to 5% in Camas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sullivan city at 35%, compared to 9% in Camas.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Camas at 1% compared to 0% in Sullivan city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camas | Sullivan city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 22.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 22.3% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 9.9% | 24.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 51.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camas vs Sullivan city
- In Sullivan city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 14.7% in Camas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Camas at 23.8% compared to 21.9% in Sullivan city.
- Sullivan city has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Camas at 19.2% compared to 13.7% in Sullivan city.
- Sullivan city has higher obesity rates at 51.2% compared to 28.5% in Camas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sullivan city at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Camas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camas | Sullivan city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (110) | 2.6% (101) |
| High School Diploma | 9.9% (2,708) | 9.2% (361) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,021) | 61.1% (2,384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.5% (9,172) | 4.6% (180) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camas vs Sullivan city
- In Sullivan city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.4% in Camas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camas hold a high school diploma at 9.9% compared to 9.2% in Sullivan city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sullivan city at 61.1%, compared to 3.7% in Camas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.5% compared to 4.6% in Sullivan city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.