Demographics details for Camas, WA vs Sitka, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camas, WA vs Sitka, AK.
| Data | Camas | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,371 | 8,382 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $133,829 | $95,261 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Camas vs Sitka
- In Camas, the population is higher at 27,371, compared to 8,382 in Sitka.
- Residents in Camas have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 39.5 years in Sitka.
- Camas has a higher median income of $133,829 compared to $95,261 in Sitka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Camas at 49.0% compared to 45.0% in Sitka.
- The poverty level is higher in Sitka at 8%, compared to 4% in Camas.
- The unemployment rate in Camas is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.3% in Sitka.
Demographics
Demographics Camas vs Sitka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camas | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 73 | 57 |
| Asian | 10 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 9 |
Demographics Comparison: Camas vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Camas at 2% compared to 1% in Sitka.
- Camas has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 57% in Sitka.
- The Asian population is larger in Camas at 10% compared to 8% in Sitka.
- Sitka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Camas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sitka at 18%, compared to 9% in Camas.
- In Sitka, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 1% in Camas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camas | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 9.9% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camas vs Sitka
- More residents in Camas report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 14.6% in Sitka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Camas at 23.8% compared to 18.7% in Sitka.
- Sitka has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sitka at 19.3% compared to 19.2% in Camas.
- Sitka has higher obesity rates at 31.7% compared to 28.5% in Camas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sitka at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Camas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camas | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (110) | 0.4% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 9.9% (2,708) | 16.7% (1,396) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,021) | 5.8% (486) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.5% (9,172) | 24.8% (2,076) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camas vs Sitka
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Camas and Sitka at 0.4%.
- In Sitka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sitka at 5.8%, compared to 3.7% in Camas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.5% compared to 24.8% in Sitka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.