Demographics details for Camas, WA vs San leandro, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camas, WA vs San leandro, CA.
| Data | Camas | San leandro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,371 | 86,762 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $133,829 | $97,141 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Camas vs San leandro
- The population in San leandro is higher at 86,762, compared to 27,371 in Camas.
- The median age in San leandro is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 40.3 years in Camas.
- Camas has a higher median income of $133,829 compared to $97,141 in San leandro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Camas at 49.0% compared to 40.0% in San leandro.
- The poverty level is higher in San leandro at 12%, compared to 4% in Camas.
- San leandro has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.7% in Camas.
Demographics
Demographics Camas vs San leandro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camas | San leandro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 11 |
| White | 73 | 12 |
| Asian | 10 | 36 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Camas vs San leandro
- In San leandro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 2% in Camas.
- Camas has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 12% in San leandro.
- In San leandro, the Asian population stands at 36%, greater than 10% in Camas.
- San leandro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 5% in Camas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San leandro at 11%, compared to 9% in Camas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Camas and San leandro at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camas | San leandro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 9.9% | 11.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camas vs San leandro
- In San leandro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.7% in Camas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Camas at 23.8% compared to 16.8% in San leandro.
- San leandro has a higher smoking rate at 11.1% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Camas at 19.2% compared to 14.6% in San leandro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Camas at 28.5% compared to 26.7% in San leandro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in San leandro at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Camas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camas | San leandro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (110) | 3.5% (2,999) |
| High School Diploma | 9.9% (2,708) | 16.2% (14,031) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,021) | 17.8% (15,482) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.5% (9,172) | 25.2% (21,903) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camas vs San leandro
- In San leandro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.4% in Camas.
- In San leandro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San leandro at 17.8%, compared to 3.7% in Camas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.5% compared to 25.2% in San leandro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.