Demographics details for Camas, WA vs Franklinton, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camas, WA vs Franklinton, LA.
| Data | Camas | Franklinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,371 | 3,593 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $133,829 | $31,645 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Camas vs Franklinton
- In Camas, the population is higher at 27,371, compared to 3,593 in Franklinton.
- Residents in Camas have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 39.5 years in Franklinton.
- Camas has a higher median income of $133,829 compared to $31,645 in Franklinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Camas at 49.0% compared to 26.0% in Franklinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Franklinton at 19%, compared to 4% in Camas.
- The unemployment rate in Camas is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.0% in Franklinton.
Demographics
Demographics Camas vs Franklinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camas | Franklinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 54 |
| White | 73 | 41 |
| Asian | 10 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Camas vs Franklinton
- In Franklinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 54% compared to 2% in Camas.
- Camas has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 41% in Franklinton.
- The Asian population is larger in Camas at 10% compared to 0% in Franklinton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Camas at 5% compared to 1% in Franklinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Camas at 9% compared to 4% in Franklinton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Camas at 1% compared to 0% in Franklinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camas | Franklinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 21.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 9.9% | 27.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 46.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camas vs Franklinton
- In Franklinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 14.7% in Camas.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Franklinton at 25.8% versus 23.8% in Camas.
- Franklinton has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Camas at 19.2% compared to 14.8% in Franklinton.
- Franklinton has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 28.5% in Camas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Franklinton at 33.0% compared to 8.0% in Camas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camas | Franklinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (110) | 0.8% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 9.9% (2,708) | 23.5% (844) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,021) | 20.5% (737) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.5% (9,172) | 5.2% (187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camas vs Franklinton
- In Franklinton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Camas.
- In Franklinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Franklinton at 20.5%, compared to 3.7% in Camas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.5% compared to 5.2% in Franklinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.