Demographics details for Camas, WA vs Fort dodge, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camas, WA vs Fort dodge, IA.
| Data | Camas | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,371 | 24,657 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $133,829 | $59,452 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Camas vs Fort dodge
- In Camas, the population is higher at 27,371, compared to 24,657 in Fort dodge.
- Residents in Camas have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 37.2 years in Fort dodge.
- Camas has a higher median income of $133,829 compared to $59,452 in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Camas at 49.0% compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- Camas has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- The unemployment rate in Camas is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Fort dodge.
Demographics
Demographics Camas vs Fort dodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Camas | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 73 | 79 |
| Asian | 10 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Camas vs Fort dodge
- In Fort dodge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Camas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort dodge at 79% compared to 73% in Camas.
- The Asian population is larger in Camas at 10% compared to 2% in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Camas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Camas at 9% compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Camas at 1% compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Camas | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 9.9% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 21.2% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camas vs Fort dodge
- In Fort dodge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.7% in Camas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Camas at 23.8% compared to 19.3% in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 19.2% in Camas.
- Fort dodge has higher obesity rates at 35.0% compared to 28.5% in Camas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort dodge at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Camas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Camas | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (110) | 0.7% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 9.9% (2,708) | 18.8% (4,633) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,021) | 12.2% (2,998) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.5% (9,172) | 13.8% (3,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camas vs Fort dodge
- In Fort dodge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Camas.
- In Fort dodge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort dodge at 12.2%, compared to 3.7% in Camas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Camas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.5% compared to 13.8% in Fort dodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.