Demographics details for Callaway, MN vs Summerfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Callaway, MN vs Summerfield, OH.
| Data | Callaway | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 173 | 242 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $29,412 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Callaway vs Summerfield
- The population in Summerfield is higher at 242, compared to 173 in Callaway.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 39.9 years in Callaway.
- Callaway has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Callaway at 49.0% compared to 36.0% in Summerfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Summerfield at 13%, compared to 8% in Callaway.
- Summerfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Callaway.
Demographics
Demographics Callaway vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Callaway | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 46 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 33 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Callaway vs Summerfield
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Callaway and Summerfield at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 97% compared to 46% in Callaway.
- Both Callaway and Summerfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Callaway at 5% compared to 3% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Callaway at 16% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Callaway at 33% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Callaway | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 27.4% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 47.8% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Callaway vs Summerfield
- More residents in Callaway report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.1% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Callaway at 26.1% compared to 24.2% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Callaway at 27.4% compared to 22.3% in Summerfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Callaway at 20.5% compared to 17.9% in Summerfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Callaway at 47.8% compared to 39.2% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Callaway at 28.0% compared to 17.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Callaway | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1) | 1.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 27.2% (47) | 31.4% (76) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (38) | 17.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (25) | 2.1% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Callaway vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Callaway.
- In Summerfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 27.2% in Callaway.
- More residents in Callaway have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 17.4% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.