Demographics details for Callaway, MN vs South charleston, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Callaway, MN vs South charleston, OH.
Data | Callaway | South charleston |
---|---|---|
Population | 173 | 1,696 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 42.3 years |
Median Income | $50,000 | $47,137 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Callaway vs South charleston
- The population in South charleston is higher at 1,696, compared to 173 in Callaway.
- The median age in South charleston is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 39.9 years in Callaway.
- Callaway has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $47,137 in South charleston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Callaway at 49.0% compared to 34.0% in South charleston.
- Callaway has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in South charleston.
- South charleston has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Callaway.
Demographics
Demographics Callaway vs South charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Callaway | South charleston |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 4 |
White | 46 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
American Indian | 33 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Callaway vs South charleston
- In South charleston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Callaway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South charleston at 88% compared to 46% in Callaway.
- In South charleston, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Callaway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Callaway at 5% compared to 3% in South charleston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Callaway at 16% compared to 4% in South charleston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Callaway at 33% compared to 0% in South charleston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Callaway | South charleston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.6% |
Depression | 26.1% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 27.4% | 22.2% |
Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 47.8% | 42.6% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Callaway vs South charleston
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Callaway and South charleston at 18.8%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Callaway at 26.1% compared to 25.3% in South charleston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Callaway at 27.4% compared to 22.2% in South charleston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Callaway at 20.5% compared to 17.8% in South charleston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Callaway at 47.8% compared to 42.6% in South charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Callaway at 28.0% compared to 23.0% in South charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Callaway | South charleston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (1) | 0.3% (5) |
High School Diploma | 27.2% (47) | 26.6% (451) |
Less than High School | 22.0% (38) | 21.6% (367) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (25) | 8.5% (145) |
Education Levels Comparison: Callaway vs South charleston
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in South charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway hold a high school diploma at 27.2% compared to 26.6% in South charleston.
- More residents in Callaway have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 21.6% in South charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 8.5% in South charleston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.