Demographics details for Callaway, MN vs Silverhill, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Callaway, MN vs Silverhill, AL.
| Data | Callaway | Silverhill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 173 | 1,369 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $58,510 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Callaway vs Silverhill
- The population in Silverhill is higher at 1,369, compared to 173 in Callaway.
- The median age in Silverhill is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 39.9 years in Callaway.
- Silverhill has a higher median income of $58,510, compared to $50,000 in Callaway.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Callaway at 49.0% compared to 26.0% in Silverhill.
- The poverty level is higher in Silverhill at 10%, compared to 8% in Callaway.
- Silverhill has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Callaway.
Demographics
Demographics Callaway vs Silverhill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Callaway | Silverhill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 46 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 2 |
| American Indian | 33 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Callaway vs Silverhill
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Callaway and Silverhill at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Silverhill at 90% compared to 46% in Callaway.
- Both Callaway and Silverhill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Silverhill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Callaway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Callaway at 16% compared to 2% in Silverhill.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Callaway at 33% compared to 1% in Silverhill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Callaway | Silverhill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 27.4% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 47.8% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Callaway vs Silverhill
- More residents in Callaway report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.7% in Silverhill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Callaway at 26.1% compared to 24.9% in Silverhill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Callaway at 27.4% compared to 17.6% in Silverhill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Callaway at 20.5% compared to 17.7% in Silverhill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Callaway at 47.8% compared to 38.2% in Silverhill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Callaway at 28.0% compared to 6.0% in Silverhill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Callaway | Silverhill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1) | 2.0% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 27.2% (47) | 10.1% (138) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (38) | 5.4% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (25) | 11.5% (157) |
Education Levels Comparison: Callaway vs Silverhill
- In Silverhill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.6% in Callaway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway hold a high school diploma at 27.2% compared to 10.1% in Silverhill.
- More residents in Callaway have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 5.4% in Silverhill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 11.5% in Silverhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.