Demographics details for Callaway, MN vs New cambria, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Callaway, MN vs New cambria, KS.
| Data | Callaway | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 173 | 104 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $83,601 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Callaway vs New cambria
- In Callaway, the population is higher at 173, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- Residents in Callaway have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher median income of $83,601, compared to $50,000 in Callaway.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Callaway at 49.0% compared to 32.0% in New cambria.
- The poverty level is higher in New cambria at 9%, compared to 8% in Callaway.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Callaway and New cambria at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Callaway vs New cambria provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Callaway | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 46 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 1 |
| American Indian | 33 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Callaway vs New cambria
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Callaway and New cambria at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New cambria at 96% compared to 46% in Callaway.
- In New cambria, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Callaway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Callaway at 5% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Callaway at 16% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Callaway at 33% compared to 0% in New cambria.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Callaway | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 27.4% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 47.8% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Callaway vs New cambria
- More residents in Callaway report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Depression is more prevalent in Callaway at 26.1% compared to 20.8% in New cambria.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Callaway at 27.4% compared to 16.5% in New cambria.
- Binge drinking is more common in Callaway at 20.5% compared to 20.0% in New cambria.
- Obesity rates are higher in Callaway at 47.8% compared to 33.7% in New cambria.
- Disability percentages are higher in Callaway at 28.0% compared to 12.0% in New cambria.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Callaway | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 27.2% (47) | 18.3% (19) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (38) | 3.8% (4) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (25) | 8.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Callaway vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway hold a high school diploma at 27.2% compared to 18.3% in New cambria.
- More residents in Callaway have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 3.8% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.