Demographics details for Callaway, MN vs Bridgeport, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Callaway, MN vs Bridgeport, CT.
| Data | Callaway | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 173 | 148,377 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $54,440 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Callaway vs Bridgeport
- The population in Bridgeport is higher at 148,377, compared to 173 in Callaway.
- Residents in Callaway have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $54,440, compared to $50,000 in Callaway.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Callaway at 49.0% compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 12%, compared to 8% in Callaway.
- Bridgeport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.2% in Callaway.
Demographics
Demographics Callaway vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Callaway | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 22 |
| White | 46 | 26 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 9 |
| American Indian | 33 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Callaway vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Callaway.
- Callaway has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Callaway.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 5% in Callaway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Callaway at 16% compared to 9% in Bridgeport.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Callaway at 33% compared to 0% in Bridgeport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Callaway | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 27.4% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 47.8% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Callaway vs Bridgeport
- More residents in Callaway report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Callaway at 26.1% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Callaway at 27.4% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Callaway at 20.5% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Callaway at 47.8% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Callaway at 28.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Callaway | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1) | 2.5% (3,659) |
| High School Diploma | 27.2% (47) | 18.7% (27,806) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (38) | 23.9% (35,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (25) | 16.8% (24,999) |
Education Levels Comparison: Callaway vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Callaway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Callaway hold a high school diploma at 27.2% compared to 18.7% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 23.9%, compared to 22.0% in Callaway.
- In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 14.5% in Callaway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.