Demographics details for Calamus, IA vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Calamus, IA vs Whitehall, WI.
| Data | Calamus | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 352 | 1,632 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $67,708 | $56,894 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Calamus vs Whitehall
- The population in Whitehall is higher at 1,632, compared to 352 in Calamus.
- Residents in Calamus have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 36.8 years in Whitehall.
- Calamus has a higher median income of $67,708 compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Calamus at 49.0% compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- The poverty level is higher in Whitehall at 7%, compared to 5% in Calamus.
- Whitehall has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Calamus.
Demographics
Demographics Calamus vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Calamus | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 95 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Calamus vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Calamus.
- Calamus has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 83% in Whitehall.
- Both Calamus and Whitehall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Calamus.
- Both Calamus and Whitehall have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Calamus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Calamus | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Calamus vs Whitehall
- More residents in Calamus report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 24.0% versus 19.6% in Calamus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Calamus at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in Whitehall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 23.1% in Calamus.
- Obesity rates are higher in Calamus at 40.2% compared to 34.9% in Whitehall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Calamus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Calamus | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (97) | 24.4% (398) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (20) | 15.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (51) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Calamus vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Calamus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Calamus hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 24.4% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whitehall at 15.7%, compared to 5.7% in Calamus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Calamus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.