Demographics details for Calamus, IA vs Markleeville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Calamus, IA vs Markleeville, CA.

Data Calamus Markleeville
Population 352 163
Median Age 40.8 years 64.6 years
Median Income $67,708 $93,333
Married Families 49.0% 63.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Calamus vs Markleeville

  • In Calamus, the population is higher at 352, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
  • The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 40.8 years in Calamus.
  • Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $67,708 in Calamus.
  • In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 49.0% in Calamus.
  • Calamus has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • Markleeville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Calamus.

Demographics

Demographics Calamus vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Calamus Markleeville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 95 77
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 23
Two or More Races 3 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Calamus vs Markleeville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Calamus and Markleeville at 0%.
  • Calamus has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 77% in Markleeville.
  • Both Calamus and Markleeville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Markleeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Calamus.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Calamus at 3% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Calamus and Markleeville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Calamus Markleeville
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 12.0%
Depression 19.6% 23.0%
Smoking 18.0% 15.4%
Binge Drinking 23.1% 17.1%
Obesity 40.2% 30.0%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Calamus vs Markleeville

  • In Markleeville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Calamus.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Markleeville at 23.0% versus 19.6% in Calamus.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Calamus at 18.0% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Calamus at 23.1% compared to 17.1% in Markleeville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Calamus at 40.2% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Markleeville at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Calamus.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Calamus Markleeville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 27.6% (97) 19.6% (32)
Less than High School 5.7% (20) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.5% (51) 35.6% (58)

Education Levels Comparison: Calamus vs Markleeville

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Calamus and Markleeville at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Calamus hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
  • More residents in Calamus have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 14.5% in Calamus.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.