Demographics details for Cabot, AR vs Fishing creek, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cabot, AR vs Fishing creek, MD.
Data | Cabot | Fishing creek |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,844 | 235 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 55.9 years |
Median Income | $69,094 | $76,250 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 58.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cabot vs Fishing creek
- In Cabot, the population is higher at 26,844, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
- The median age in Fishing creek is higher at 55.9 years, compared to 35.7 years in Cabot.
- Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250, compared to $69,094 in Cabot.
- In Fishing creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 40.0% in Cabot.
- Cabot has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- Fishing creek has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Cabot.
Demographics
Demographics Cabot vs Fishing creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cabot | Fishing creek |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 84 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cabot vs Fishing creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cabot at 4% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishing creek at 100% compared to 84% in Cabot.
- The Asian population is larger in Cabot at 1% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cabot at 5% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cabot at 6% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cabot and Fishing creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cabot | Fishing creek |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 9.6% |
Depression | 27.7% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 36.0% | 33.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cabot vs Fishing creek
- More residents in Cabot report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.3% in Fishing creek.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cabot at 27.7% compared to 21.2% in Fishing creek.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cabot at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Fishing creek.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fishing creek at 16.8% compared to 15.9% in Cabot.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cabot at 36.0% compared to 33.1% in Fishing creek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 14.0% in Cabot.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cabot | Fishing creek |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (261) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.0% (4,840) | 34.5% (81) |
Less than High School | 7.7% (2,068) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (4,354) | 16.2% (38) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cabot vs Fishing creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Cabot have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
- In Fishing creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.5% compared to 18.0% in Cabot.
- More residents in Cabot have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Cabot and Fishing creek at 16.2%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.