Demographics details for Butte, MT vs Clarkesville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Butte, MT vs Clarkesville, GA.
| Data | Butte | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,416 | 2,112 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $56,522 | $64,848 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Butte vs Clarkesville
- In Butte, the population is higher at 35,416, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
- The median age in Clarkesville is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 40.2 years in Butte.
- Clarkesville has a higher median income of $64,848, compared to $56,522 in Butte.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Butte at 36.0% compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- Butte has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- The unemployment rate in Butte is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Butte vs Clarkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Butte | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 89 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Butte vs Clarkesville
- In Clarkesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Butte.
- Butte has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 81% in Clarkesville.
- In Clarkesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Butte.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Butte at 5% compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarkesville at 6%, compared to 4% in Butte.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Butte at 2% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Butte | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Butte vs Clarkesville
- In Clarkesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Butte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Butte at 25.6% compared to 23.6% in Clarkesville.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Butte and Clarkesville at 18.4%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Butte at 23.0% compared to 16.3% in Clarkesville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Butte at 32.5% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Butte at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Clarkesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Butte | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (181) | 0.3% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (6,267) | 16.9% (356) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (2,983) | 15.2% (322) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (6,615) | 21.4% (453) |
Education Levels Comparison: Butte vs Clarkesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Butte have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Butte hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarkesville at 15.2%, compared to 8.4% in Butte.
- In Clarkesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 18.7% in Butte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.