Demographics details for Butler, PA vs Little rock, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Butler, PA vs Little rock, AR.
| Data | Butler | Little rock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,176 | 202,864 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $39,546 | $58,697 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Butler vs Little rock
- The population in Little rock is higher at 202,864, compared to 13,176 in Butler.
- Residents in Butler have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 36.6 years in Little rock.
- Little rock has a higher median income of $58,697, compared to $39,546 in Butler.
- In Little rock, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 26.0% in Butler.
- The poverty level is higher in Little rock at 14%, compared to 12% in Butler.
- The unemployment rate in Butler is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Little rock.
Demographics
Demographics Butler vs Little rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Butler | Little rock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 41 |
| White | 88 | 44 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Butler vs Little rock
- In Little rock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 3% in Butler.
- Butler has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 44% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Butler.
- Little rock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Butler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Butler at 5% compared to 4% in Little rock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Butler and Little rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Butler | Little rock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 39.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Butler vs Little rock
- More residents in Butler report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.9% in Little rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Butler at 24.4% compared to 21.9% in Little rock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Butler at 24.6% compared to 19.0% in Little rock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Butler at 17.4% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
- Little rock has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 38.2% in Butler.
- Disability percentages are higher in Butler at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Little rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Butler | Little rock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (14) | 0.7% (1,359) |
| High School Diploma | 23.6% (3,115) | 12.2% (24,667) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (1,222) | 7.3% (14,766) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (2,049) | 29.4% (59,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Butler vs Little rock
- In Little rock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Butler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Butler hold a high school diploma at 23.6% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
- More residents in Butler have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 7.3% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 15.6% in Butler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.