Demographics details for Butler, GA vs Junction city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Butler, GA vs Junction city, KS.
| Data | Butler | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,827 | 22,264 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 28.5 years |
| Median Income | $27,656 | $60,709 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Butler vs Junction city
- The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 1,827 in Butler.
- Residents in Butler have a higher median age of 33.5 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709, compared to $27,656 in Butler.
- In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 24.0% in Butler.
- Butler has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 13% in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.5% in Butler.
Demographics
Demographics Butler vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Butler | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 20 |
| White | 22 | 43 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Butler vs Junction city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Butler at 70% compared to 20% in Junction city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Junction city at 43% compared to 22% in Butler.
- In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Butler.
- Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Butler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 4% in Butler.
- In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Butler.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Butler | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 46.9% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Butler vs Junction city
- More residents in Butler report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Butler at 23.4% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Butler at 25.7% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 12.7% in Butler.
- Obesity rates are higher in Butler at 46.9% compared to 41.8% in Junction city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Butler at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Junction city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Butler | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 1.0% (216) |
| High School Diploma | 28.5% (520) | 12.4% (2,755) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (436) | 6.9% (1,535) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (147) | 13.2% (2,941) |
Education Levels Comparison: Butler vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Butler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Butler hold a high school diploma at 28.5% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- More residents in Butler have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- In Junction city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 8.0% in Butler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.