Demographics details for Bush, LA vs Grayson, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bush, LA vs Grayson, GA.
| Data | Bush | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 224 | 4,753 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $60,000 | $121,421 |
| Married Families | 70.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bush vs Grayson
- The population in Grayson is higher at 4,753, compared to 224 in Bush.
- Residents in Bush have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421, compared to $60,000 in Bush.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bush at 70.0% compared to 47.0% in Grayson.
- Bush has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Grayson.
- The unemployment rate in Bush is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Grayson.
Demographics
Demographics Bush vs Grayson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bush | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 74 |
| White | 100 | 20 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bush vs Grayson
- In Grayson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 0% in Bush.
- Bush has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- In Grayson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bush.
- Grayson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Bush.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grayson at 1%, compared to 0% in Bush.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bush and Grayson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bush | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.5% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bush vs Grayson
- In Grayson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Bush.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grayson at 17.5% versus 0.0% in Bush.
- Grayson has a higher smoking rate at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in Bush.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grayson at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Bush.
- Grayson has higher obesity rates at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Bush.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grayson at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Bush.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bush | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 14.8% (703) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 6.4% (302) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 24.7% (1,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bush vs Grayson
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bush and Grayson at 0.0%.
- In Grayson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Bush.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grayson at 6.4%, compared to 0.0% in Bush.
- In Grayson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 0.0% in Bush.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.