Demographics details for Burnt ranch, CA vs Waukegan, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burnt ranch, CA vs Waukegan, IL.
| Data | Burnt ranch | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 228 | 87,976 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,357 | $66,077 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.5 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Waukegan
- The population in Waukegan is higher at 87,976, compared to 228 in Burnt ranch.
- Residents in Burnt ranch have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 34.5 years in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher median income of $66,077, compared to $55,357 in Burnt ranch.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burnt ranch at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Waukegan.
- The poverty level is higher in Waukegan at 14%, compared to 13% in Burnt ranch.
- The unemployment rate in Burnt ranch is higher at 7.5%, compared to 6.4% in Waukegan.
Demographics
Demographics Burnt ranch vs Waukegan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burnt ranch | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 18 |
| White | 97 | 2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 54 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 18 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- Burnt ranch has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 2% in Waukegan.
- In Waukegan, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Burnt ranch.
- Waukegan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waukegan at 18%, compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Burnt ranch at 3% compared to 1% in Waukegan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burnt ranch | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Waukegan
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Burnt ranch and Waukegan at 16.6%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burnt ranch at 20.0% compared to 17.9% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 14.8% in Burnt ranch.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burnt ranch at 19.5% compared to 15.2% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 29.9% in Burnt ranch.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waukegan at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Burnt ranch.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burnt ranch | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.1% (2,711) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (27) | 16.5% (14,503) |
| Less than High School | 9.6% (22) | 27.1% (23,842) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (43) | 13.9% (12,220) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.0% in Burnt ranch.
- In Waukegan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 11.8% in Burnt ranch.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waukegan at 27.1%, compared to 9.6% in Burnt ranch.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burnt ranch hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 13.9% in Waukegan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.